Monthly Archives: May 2007

Eurovision!! Eeeeeeee!!!

It’s been hard to restart blogging after Bento’s latest post, for obvious reasons. Especially when it concerns something as frivolous as Eurovision. But it’s on now, or at least the semi-finals are. Yes you heard right, SEMI FINALS.

The authorities in their wisdom have responded to the ever-widening borders of Eurovision Europe by establishing the 1st 2-part Eurovision; there are now simply too many contestants and countries to fit into a 3-hour format. 42 of them, now including Georgia (the Russians won’t have the nerve to invade after this) and the Czech Republic. I think this is a triumph for Europe, proof of concept if you like.

Continue reading

Civilization, like beauty, is skin-deep

Dear Baruch,

It is stories like these that lead me to despair at the future of humanity. A 17-year old Kurdish girl falls in love with a Sunni boy from a nearby village. She is ambushed, and then stoned to death… as the police stand by, and as the crowd takes videos with mobile phones. Download the videos here.

I thought for a long time about whether I should watch these. In the end, I am glad I saw them, because I think we all too often keep such stories abstract, perhaps to shield ourselves from highly unpleasant truths. The visceral quality of the videos is a reminder to all of us that for large parts of the world, we have not progressed one jot since Spinoza’s time (q.v. the deWitts’s gruesome ending).

What would Spinoza have done? My gut reaction upon seeing the videos is to “exterminate the brutes”, but alas my rational self recognizes that the more likely scenario, were I to have placed myself between the mob and the girl, is that the brutes would have exterminated me. The horror, the horror.

The only consolation? That it appears, at the moment, that “honour” killings are deemed barbaric by the West. It’s a good reason to agitate for western notions of militant tolerance, don’t you think, lest we lose this enlightened perspective? The Dutch, this time round, seem to be at the forefront of this process. Time to move to Amsterdam?

[Update: An Amnesty International statement on the killing of Du’a Khalil Aswad. Worth mentioning that Du'a's murder is not an isolated event. What sets it apart is that it was filmed.]

Hitch has a Glitch

Christopher Hitchens, shibboleth smasher, is out with his new book smashing the greatest shibboleth of them all. Clearly not having fucked off enough people in his relatively busy life so far, he’s trying to economise in terms of bang for the buck with his latest, god is not Great (note the lack of capitalisation the derivative Baruch-copying whore. The link is hilarious, though), subtitled, How Religion Poisons Everything.

Frankly, with as much sympathy as I have for the book’s obvious conclusion, I don’t think I’ll be buying it. I am pretty godded out, having consumed both Dawkins and Harris recently and followed the Sullivan-Harris blogalogue (which seems to have ended here) quite intensively. Also I am fairly persuaded that some form of ultimate Substance, some essence of information, qua Spinoza, exists, and while we can call it Nature, the Laws of Physics, the DNA of the Universe or even the flying spaghetti monster, we may also call it god, and Spinoza did.

I find Hitchen’s positions quite suspect in many ways, and don’t want to enrich him further. I think he is a very clever man, but fear he is somehow not very wise. There is something about the knee-jerk revisionism of people like Hitch that worries me; it is a common fallacy for British people of a certain generation and education to play the smart alec; the Economist does it, people like Niall Ferguson do it, god knows I have the tendency too it was drummed into me at Cambridge. It impresses the smaller minded, the spoonfed. Americans love it. But while it makes good polemic it does not make good policy, and I have learned the hard way when it comes to actions affecting something serious like someone’s stock positions, or indeed the lives of millions, that we should look quite askance at solutions coming from people who have Revisionism hanging like a bat in the rafters of their minds. Sometimes the crowd really is right.

You will have to do without me for a while, adoring public, I am taking the weekend off and tootling off to Lugano with some friends. I leave you in the capable hands of Bento. Mind you, what his hands seem most capable of is doing bugger all on this blog, the lazy sod. We’ve all got jobs, you know.

Vote Icahn!

I, Baruch, am supposed periodically to rant about my job under the category “Lens Grinding” – so called because that was the way that Spinoza earned enough money to philosophise; grinding glass lenses for telescopes, microscopes and other uses. It was highly specialised work, extremely technically demanding, and very much on the hard cutting edge of C17th high tech. Spinoza was very good at it: “the lenses that the Jew of Voorburg has in his microscopes have an admirable polish,” wrote noted Dutch scientist Christiaan Huygens. This is sort of like Steve Jobs praising one’s ability to design computer hardware.

Unlike Bento, I actually have a proper job. I am what they used to call a ”stock operator”; I co-manage a global tech fund. I pick stocks by analysing high level trends and financial minutiae, make hard decisions based on woefully incomplete information, act on it anyway and take the consequences. I wouldn’t do anything else. I surprise myself by being right quite often, and by generally making pots of money for other people. For my first trick I will tell you about Motorola, a particular bugbear of mine, and a story you can find nowhere else. IN NO WAY, OF COURSE, IS ANYTHING THAT FOLLOWS TO BE VIEWED AS ANY SORT OF INVESTMENT ADVICE. Although as I am a genius, you’d be crazy not to do as I say. Continue reading